Loading...
Loading...
68% of American women wear size 14 or above. Yet 97.7% of fashion imagery features straight-size models. This isn't just a representation issue—it's a conversion barrier. Your customers can't see themselves in your clothes.
The plus-size fashion market represents $119 billion in the US alone, serving the majority of American women. Yet the industry faces a fundamental disconnect: the shoppers who need visualization most are the ones who see themselves least in product imagery.
Research consistently shows that consumer trust increases 71% when brands feature diverse body types. But photography-based representation doesn't scale. Virtual try-on is the only way to show every body type in every garment—representation at infinite scale.
68%
Of US women wear size 14+
0.8%
Runway looks are plus-size
71%
Trust increase with representation
Enter your current metrics to see how inclusive visualization impacts conversion and returns.
Monthly Revenue Lift
$75K
+75% growth
Returns Avoided
$3K/mo
88 fewer returns
Annual Net Impact
$848K
Total benefit per year
*Projections based on industry research. Actual results may vary based on implementation and product category.
According to the Vogue Business Autumn/Winter 2025 Size Inclusivity Report, 97.7% of runway looks were straight-size.
Plus-size representation fell from 2.8% of looks in 2020 to just 0.8% in 2025. London Fashion Week saw plus-size models drop from 80 to 26 in one year.
The math is stark: 68% of shoppers are represented by 2.3% of imagery. These shoppers are being asked to imagine how garments will look on their bodies based on how they look on bodies completely different from theirs.
71%
Consumer trust rises dramatically when brands feature plus-size models. Trust is the prerequisite to purchase—especially when shoppers can't try on before buying.
67%
Globally, 67% of plus-size customers choose brands that promote body diversity and acceptance. Representation isn't just ethical—it's competitive advantage.
When shoppers see a garment on a model who looks like them, they engage in mental simulation—imagining themselves wearing it. This psychological mechanism is the foundation of purchase intent.
When the model doesn't look like them, mental simulation breaks down. Uncertainty prevents conversion.
Founded with inclusivity as a core principle. Size range: XS to 4X. Marketing features models of all sizes, races, ages, and abilities in every campaign.
Result: $3 billion valuation, $150M+ annual revenue, industry-leading engagement rates.
Sizes 00-24 in every style from launch. Uses inclusive model sizing on product pages—a size 0 next to a size 16 to show real fit across bodies.
Major retailer with diverse model representation across campaigns. Has experimented with showing products on multiple body types.
Even brands committed to representation face a fundamental constraint: photography doesn't scale. VTO—which can show any garment on any body—is the scalable solution.
VTO shows the shopper themselves in the garment—not a model of any size. This is the ultimate representation: your exact body in every product.
Adding a new product or supporting a new body type costs nothing incrementally. Photography requires new shoots for each; VTO scales infinitely.
VTO with body measurement matches the shopper's dimensions against the specific item. "For your body, this item in size 18 will fit like this."
Beyond fit: see how colors, cuts, and styles look on your specific body. "Will this neckline suit me?" becomes answerable.
| Scenario | Conversion Lift | Return Reduction | Trust Impact |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conservative | +30% | -15% | Significant |
| Moderate (Expected) | +50% | -25% | Substantial |
| Aggressive | +80% | -35% | Transformational |
Plus-size fashion serves the majority of American women—yet the industry continues to show them clothes on bodies that don't look like theirs. Virtual try-on solves the representation problem at scale.